Goose; meet gander

Listening to the Dems whine about angry people is kind of funny. I don't remember them having such a big problem with it historically. Enjoy this stroll down memory lane.

Blue Dogs Leave the Room

Not heard from since Favre became a Viking, Hitler makes an appearance to comment on the victory of Scott Brown in Massachusetts:

No sympathy here

I'm not sure which is more absurd in this column by Tim Rutten; the almost biblical terms in which the far left sees a man whose "legend" remains strictly potential, or how he characterizes the response to Obama being awarded something for...well...nothing:

It would have been unthinkable a few years ago that the opposition party would not have at least extended the president perfunctory congratulations for this honor; he is, after all, the head of state.

I guess it depends on how you define "few."

It's not so much the revision of Obama - from the moment he was elected - which seeks to write history before it even occurs; it's the revision of the years 2000-2008, during which the left - apparently - would have found it "unthinkable" to act in a manner lacking respect for the "head of state."

I don't particularly care for some of the criticism of Obama. I have no time for birthers. But I have no sympathy for a left suddenly "appalled" at the tone. The left created this atmosphere every day for eight years. As far as I'm concerned they can eat it. They bought it, they own it.

It's a Sickness

At HuffPo, will the attacks on Sarah Palin using her children ever cease?

In Sarah Palin’s resignation announcement she complained about the treatment of her son Trig who always teaches her life lessons. She said that the “world needs more Trigs, not fewer.” That’s a presidential campaign promise we can all get behind. She will be the first politician to actually try to increase the population of retarded people.

Too bad HuffPo pulled this insidious post. The world would know the left much better if it didn't have such easy access to the "delete" key.

Read the post in its entirety here.

Over at TPM, a really classy joke:

Q: What's the difference between Sarah Palin's mouth and her vagina.
A: Only some of the things that come out of her vagina are retarded.

Of course, the world would be so much better if the right wasn't so hateful.

Lockjaw

For the record, I hope Sarah Palin never removes her teeth from David Letterman's neck.

What an awful thing to say, one of those things it is only okay to say about conservative women and their families. Once again, "feminists" have proven to be a bunch of frauds who could care less if women are exploited, insulted, and degraded, as long as those women aren't feminists.

If the pervert David Letterman said that about my daughter I would kick his ass. He is an un-funny, tiny-minded troll who has long outlasted his entertainment value.

Give it up David. You suck. You're an embarrassment.

Guidance Requested

In a continuing effort by the Dead Tree Media to pretend blogs matter, Les Enfants in-house drive-by contrarian Loaf Light thinks Teaparty and the art of blogging would make a great feature story for the Valley Wire (I'd love to give you a link, but the Valley Wire is highly devoted to its wagon wheel medium).

I know what you're thinking. Why would an astute blogger such as myself subject his craft and superior opinions to this site's resident drooler? Well, believe it or not (probably not) he is actually an extremely gifted writer who, despite being a dirty Socialist and aimless rambler, would likely spin a fabulous yarn. Not to mention, it would finally give him something to write about other than his used camper.

Negotiations continue, but I thought I would put the question to the vast and highly intelligent Les Enfants readership. Should I do it? Should I politely decline? Or should I tell him to shove his story idea right up his arse?

Vile Politics

Got nothing on VP candidate Sarah Palin? No worries, there is always her daughter. From Daily Kos:

Bristol is pregnant in these pictures. She is not carrying belly fat, which grows outwardly wide, and does not become dome-shaped. That's because fat is generally evenly distributed around the abdomen and a fetus is not. Bristol's chest is sticking out, a normal body reaction when sucking in stomach muscles.

Long story short, the fat left is pushing the rumor the Palin's youngest is not their daughter but their granddaughter. The mother? Palin's teenage daughter Bristol.

Let's just assume for one crazy moment that the entire ridiculous story is true. So what? What we would essentially be talking about here is a private adoption. It has absolutely nothing to do with politics, and revealing it serves only to humiliate a teenager who has done nothing wrong, and a mother who was willing to give her a way out of being a teenage mother.

Now. Back to reality. The bump photo was taken well over a year before the baby was born, which would make Bristol's gestation one of the longest in history. So, essentially this is nothing more than a chance to rip on typical teenager chub. I've got three teenage daughters and let's just say there is nothing out of the ordinary in the "bump" photo. Ann Althouse says it best:

That is ugly. Pictures are posted, with captions like: "Sarah's waistline never changed. Her wardrobe still remained tight and professional." Note the gratuitous insult to pregnant working women. They can't possibly dress in a professional manner. There are also enlarged photos of the 16-year-old daughter with comments about the shape of her abdomen. The whole world is invited to talk about that teenager's body.

Despicable, sexist trash. Shameful.

True or false, this is just another sickening example of how low the far left will go stoop to attack political opponents personally. What's next? Suggesting Sarah Palin caused her own daughter's Down Syndrome?

Lincoln = Obama? Al Gore = Ass

Al Gore compares Obama to Lincoln:

..."before he entered the White House, Abraham Lincoln’s experience in elective office consisted of eight years in his state legislature in Springfield, Ill., and one term in Congress –- during which he showed the courage and wisdom to oppose the invasion of another country, that was popular when it started, but later condemned by history.

"The experience Lincoln’s supporters valued most in that race was his powerful ability to inspire hope in the future at a time of impasse," Gore said. "He was known chiefly as a clear thinker and a great orator, with a passion for justice and a determination to heal the deep divisions of our land.

Lincoln did indeed oppose the Mexican war, an "invasion of another country." Then, as president, he promptly invaded another country and made all-out war on it until it was thoroughly subdued. To be sure, Lincoln wanted to heal the "deep divisions of our land," but only after absolute victory was achieved. His "passion for justice"included the suspension of habeas corpus over the objection of the Supreme Court.

While Obama changes his mind on important issues almost daily, Lincoln withstood five years of intense criticism from partisans on either side of him, staying true to his own beliefs the entire time.

Obama's speeches are over-the-top, arrogant, and self-aggrandizing, in which he plays the role of the Great Savior. Lincoln's speeches, as in at Gettysburg, and in his second inaugural, were short, humble, and downplayed, if even mentioned, his own role in history as it unfolded.

Obama and Lincoln are nothing alike. And, frankly, I resent Al Gore's historical butchering of the greatest president who ever lived in order to further exalt Obama, whose entire career has involved the betterment only of Barack Obama.

Be warned!

Thou shalt not correct the Obamacans, lest thou be accuseth of being grotesque mutants in clown suits.