Even before Bush took the stage Tuesday night, John Kerry had ridden to the rescue to tell America what must be done to "win" in Iraq. While the rest of us might be under the impression that Kerry is not the president, Kerry himself labors away, safe in the knowledge that he probably should be.
Liberal Larry sees the spark of genius in the international peace-maker from Boston. I wonder why the rest of us don't?
Ever the optimist, Kerry predicted a gloomy outcome for the War in Iraq, unless Bush followed some key advice. Gleaned from previous Bush speeches and policy already in effect, Kerry's bold new ideas are perhaps our best chance to end the Quagmire in Iraq:
1. Bush must announce that the U.S. will not remain in Iraq permanently.
2. The Iraqis must be encouraged to form their own government and hold elections.
3. The Iraqis must be trained to defend themselves.
4. Saddam must be captured and held for trial.
Most importantly, a plan must be set for the withdrawal of our troops and presented to democrats in Congress or, cutting out the middle man, given directly to Al Zarqawi so he can get a jump on the killing fields when we depart.
Why would Kerry worry about the middle man now? He did not when he traveled to Paris during Vietnam to hold personal summits with the enemy. Perhaps Kerry and Zarqawi could put there heads together and find a way to get Kerry in front of a senate hearing so that he could singlehandedly end this ever-so-non-international effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment