Via Powerline, John Fund tries to shed some light on the Sandy Berger document thievery:
The Inspector General's report found that the papers Mr. Berger took outlined the adequacy of the government's knowledge of terrorist threats in the U.S. in the final months of the Clinton administration--documents that could have been of some interest to the 9/11 Commission, before which Mr. Berger was scheduled to testify. The Washington Post buried news of the Inspector General's report on page 7; the New York Times dumped it on page 36.
So, why didn't the Clinton administration do more to put bin Laden and al Qaeda out of business? Oh. Right. We don't ask that.
No comments:
Post a Comment