Look anywhere on the American political scene these days and you will find widespread liberal paranoia regarding the "religious right." The religious right is bent on turning the bow of the nation into the winds of the dark ages, and woe be the enlightened secularists along the way. Given that the religious right makes up a rather small percentage of the Republican Party, the rest of us are asked often how we can align ourselves with their brand of extremism.
A couple of points on that issue. Firstly, I have yet to have pointed out to me an instance where the religious right has "forced it's views" down the throats of anyone. Defending their culture from assaults by the ACLU does not count. Defending against an abortion on demand mentality does not count. Defending national and state laws against gay marriage does not count. Even the opening of the federal courts, widely attributed by the left as a sign of a new era of global religious rule, accomplished only the affirmation of Michael Schiavo's original position.
Yet these are the most prevalent examples of the offensive by the religious right, which sounds more and more like a contradiction in terms. Still, the paranoia on this subject knows no bounds and I am often asked, as a godless pagan, how I can align myself with these dark forces. My answer is invariably: what are my choices?
Given that both political parties have extremes, regardless of which you affiliate yourself with you get nut-jobs. The discussion then becomes, which nut-jobs are worse, the right's or the left's?
The right's "nut-jobs" sometimes refer to the sexual ambiguity of cartoon characters, or inquire as to why stuffed animals are carrying purses. Occasionally, they fight for a "culture of life" and, right or wrong, that doesn't really seem that extreme. They choose their battles based on philosophy just like any group, as the environmental or gay lobby, for instance. Their goal is to slow down the assault on the nation's traditions, plain and simple. In some cases it is in our best interests, in others for their own benefit...just like any lobby.
On the other hand, were people like me to be scared away from the Republican Party, what would await us on the other side?
The left's extremists have resorted to throwing food at conservatives. They have a suicidal philosophy on national security, think America is always the bad guy, and would love to see the United Nations rule the world. It's not that they don't believe there should be a God, but that the widely accepted God should be replaced by their favorite deity, government.
Even more concerning, is the tactics used by the left to further their agenda, which should be of concern. One need only find a Krugman column, or that of any other leftist sycophant, and replace all references to the religious right with the word "Jew" to realize we are not in Kansas anymore.
Worst of all, while the right's "religious extremists" are treated like any other lobby in Washington, the left's secular extremists are in control of the party. Howard Dean, who thinks Republicans are "evil," is in charge of the DNC. The new leaders of the party are Barbara Boxer, Ted Kennedy, and Robert Byrd; dangerous ideologues to the core. The left's heroes are Ward Churchill and Michael Moore, liars and propagandists who believe we are the true terrorists in the world.
Aside from these core beliefs, they have not one single plan for how to address the issues of the day. From the War on Terror, to social security, to health care, the party is bankrupt of ideas. In fact, the left has been reduced to an entirely obstructionist party, whose sole platform is knee-capping the government that the American people elected.
The left demands that the Republican Party end it's affiliation with the religious right and end the "grave danger" they pose to our society. Of course, they show no willingness to back away from their extremists; the global government and abortion on demand crowds, the anti-American propagandists, and the Euro-socialists-fascists.
The religious right, at it's core, seeks to preserve America in it's current form, the form that has allowed for the greatest freedoms individuals have ever enjoyed, the form that allowed our country to rise to the prominence it has in it's short history, and brought the opportunity for prosperity to everyone.
The left's extremists who, again, run the party, seek exactly the opposite; nothing short of the entire dismantling of that country, block by block, and it's rebuilding in an entirely new image.
The choice than, between right and left, is preserve or dismantle. This is the option that every American who doesn't align themselves with extremists must make when choosing a political party. Given that choice, is it any wonder that the left finds itself on the outside looking in?
3 comments:
Re: Religion and conservatives
I am from a very liberal family - parents that were traditional Kennedy Dems - lots of brothers and sisters that are proud, liberal democrats. I'm a bit of an oddball around them, developing what I have thought to be pretty independent political views over the last few years that just so happen to be considered "conservative". Oh well.
Its been interesting getting into discussions with my family from time to time about politics etc. They are very very bright, have strong opinions, but are astoundingly superficial in their reasoning. I could go on and on, but here is a quick point to tie into your post.
A while back my brother and I had an ongoing email debate about the war, and politics in general. We had never really done this before, and while it was fun, he was baffled. He could not understand why we felt so differently.So he and one of my sisters (who lives in Berkeley!) had a talk about me, and why I thought the way I did. The only thing they could come up with is that I had strong religious beliefs.
Well, this would have made some sense, if I had any real religious beliefs at all. I really don't. Agnostic conservative, thats me. A complete stranger might have made a mistaken connection like that, but close family members?
Time and again, the left wants to come up with reasons why the right "thinks the way they do". Any reason will do other than that the one that holds that conservatism might actually be a valid worldview.
Sorry for the long comment. Found your site by clicking over from Republican Jen, which I just linked to on my own blog, which you are invited to visit any time you like.
www.soapgun.blogspot.com
Pat,
I think you paint a dishonest picture here. Somehow the extemists on your side are just well-intentioned religious folk. Somehow you failed to mention Eric Rudolph. Why is that? He's representative of the extreme right, Pat. Timothy McVeigh would be another one. They exist, and they are dangerous.
According to the story on AP Eric Rudolph issued a written statement:
"a rambling, right-wing manifesto on 11 typewritten, single-spaced pages - marked the first time he offered a motive for the attacks.
''The purpose of the (Olympic) attack on July 27th (1996) was to confound, anger and embarrass the Washington government in the eyes of the world for its abominable sanctioning of abortion on demand,'' Rudolph said in the statement, in which he also quoted the Bible repeatedly, condemned homosexuality and complained that the Olympics promote ''global socialism.''
Instead of asking which wackos are the worse, why don't we just agree that wackos are bad no matter what their politics are. In the end, Pat, you and I are responsible for what we do. I don't hold you responsible for Eric Rudolph. Please don't hold me responsible for every nut who goes and buys a pie and tries throwing it at one of your nuts. LOL.
dave
Dave,
I don't consider Ann Coulter, Bill Kristol, and David Horowitz "nuts." The fact that you do goes to show that the left can't tell the difference between honest advocates and sycophants.
Rudolph and Mcveigh, they were nuts.
Your nuts seem to be running the show right now and mass procuding t-shirts calling for the assassination of Bush and military leaders, and creating art depicting Bush and others with guns to their heads.
BTW...I WAS held responsible for McVeigh, in case you don't remember. His actions were blamed on right-wing "hate" radio.
Unfortunately, the left seems to be giving their nuts a free pass right now. A sad state of affairs.
Post a Comment